Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 00:28

What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Android 16 bug is turning Pixel navigation into a nightmare - Android Central
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Review | In its third season, ‘The Gilded Age’ is as staid and sudsy as ever - The Washington Post
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Scottie Scheffler's Wife Meredith Scheffler Gets Strong Message From PGA Tour Golfer - Athlon Sports
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What do you wear when you are alone at home?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
A Cosmic Tech Mystery Results in Literal Lost Souls in This Sci-Fi Short Story - Gizmodo
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Why are Korean female leads so angry all the time?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.